-
question_answer1)
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ?strong? argument is and which a ?weak? argument is. |
Statement: Should there be an upper age limit of 65 years for contesting Parliamentary, Legislative Assembly elections? |
Arguments: I. Yes. Generally, people above the age of 65 lose their dynamism and will power. |
II. No. The life span is so increased that people remain physically and mentally active even up to the age of 80. |
A)
Only argument I is strong done
clear
B)
Only argument II is strong done
clear
C)
Either I or II is strong done
clear
D)
Neither I nor II is strong done
clear
E)
Both I and II are strong done
clear
View Solution play_arrow
-
question_answer2)
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ?strong? argument is and which a 'weak' argument is. |
Statement: Should new big industries be started in Mumbai? |
Arguments: I. Yes. It will create job opportunities. |
II. No. It will further add to the pollution of the city. |
A)
Only argument I is strong done
clear
B)
Only argument II is strong done
clear
C)
Either I or II is strong done
clear
D)
Neither I nor II is strong done
clear
E)
Both I and II are strong done
clear
View Solution play_arrow
-
question_answer3)
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ?strong? argument is and which a ?weak? argument is. |
Statement: Should night chimneys be installed in industries? |
Arguments: I. Yes. It reduces pollution at ground level. |
II. No. It increases pollution in upper atmosphere. |
A)
Only argument I is strong done
clear
B)
Only argument II is strong done
clear
C)
Either I or II is strong done
clear
D)
Neither I nor II is strong done
clear
E)
Both I and II are strong done
clear
View Solution play_arrow
-
question_answer4)
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ?strong? argument is and which a ?weak? argument is. |
Statement: Does India need so many plans for development? |
Arguments: I. Yes. Nothing can be achieved without proper planning. |
II. No. Too much time, money and energy is wasted on planning. |
A)
Only argument I is strong done
clear
B)
Only argument II is strong done
clear
C)
Either I or II is strong done
clear
D)
Neither I nor II is strong done
clear
E)
Both I and II are strong done
clear
View Solution play_arrow
-
question_answer5)
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ?strong? argument is and which a ?weak? argument is. |
Statement: Should articles of only deserving authors be allowed to be published? |
Arguments: I. Yes. It will save a lot of paper which is in short supply. |
II. No. It is not possible to draw a line between the deserving and the undeserving. |
A)
Only argument I is strong done
clear
B)
Only argument II is strong done
clear
C)
Either I or II is strong done
clear
D)
Neither I nor II is strong done
clear
E)
Both I and II are strong done
clear
View Solution play_arrow
-
question_answer6)
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a 'strong' argument is and which a 'weak' argument is. |
Statement: Should colleges be given the status of a university in India? |
Arguments: I. Yes. Colleges are in a better position to assess the student's performance and therefore the degrees will be more valid. |
II. No. It is Utopian to think that there will not be nepotism and corruption in awarding degrees by colleges. |
A)
Only argument I is strong done
clear
B)
Only argument II is strong done
clear
C)
Either I or II is strong done
clear
D)
Neither I nor II is strong done
clear
E)
Both I and II are strong done
clear
View Solution play_arrow
-
question_answer7)
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ?strong? argument is and which a ?weak? argument is. |
Statement: Should the prestigious people who have committed crime unknowingly, be met with special treatment? |
Arguments: I. Yes. The prestigious people do not commit crime intentionally. |
II. No. It is our policy that everybody is equal before the law. |
A)
Only argument I is strong done
clear
B)
Only argument II is strong done
clear
C)
Either I or II is strong done
clear
D)
Neither I nor II is strong done
clear
E)
Both I and II are strong done
clear
View Solution play_arrow
-
question_answer8)
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ?strong? argument is and which a ?weak? argument is. |
Statement: Can pollution be controlled? |
Arguments: I. Yes. If everyone realizes the hazards it may create and cooperates to get rid of it, pollution may be controlled. |
II. No. The crowded highways, factories and industries and an ever-growing population eager to acquire more and more land for constructing houses are beyond control. |
A)
Only argument I is strong done
clear
B)
Only argument II is strong done
clear
C)
Either I or II is strong done
clear
D)
Neither I nor II is strong done
clear
E)
Both I and II are strong done
clear
View Solution play_arrow
-
question_answer9)
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ?strong? argument is and which a ?weak? argument is. |
Statement: Should the railways in India be privatized in a phased manner like other public sector enterprises? |
Arguments: I. Yes. This is the only way to bring in competitiveness and provide better services to the public. |
II. No. This will pose a threat to the national security of our country as multinationals will enter into the fray. |
A)
Only argument I is strong done
clear
B)
Only argument II is strong done
clear
C)
Either I or II is strong done
clear
D)
Neither I nor II is strong done
clear
E)
Both I and II are strong done
clear
View Solution play_arrow
-
question_answer10)
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ?strong? argument is and which a ?weak? argument is. |
Statement: Should internal assessment in colleges be abolished? |
Arguments: I. Yes. This will help in reducing the possibility of favoritism. |
II. No, teaching faculty will lose control over students. |
A)
Only argument I is strong done
clear
B)
Only argument II is strong done
clear
C)
Either I or II is strong done
clear
D)
Neither I nor II is strong done
clear
E)
Both I and II are strong done
clear
View Solution play_arrow
-
question_answer11)
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ?strong? argument is and which a ?weak? argument is. |
Statement: Should all the unauthorized structures in the city be demolished? |
Arguments: I. No. Where will the people residing in such houses live? |
II. Yes. This will give a clear message to general public and they will refrain from constructing unauthorized buildings. |
A)
Only argument I is strong done
clear
B)
Only argument II is strong done
clear
C)
Either I or II is strong done
clear
D)
Neither I nor II is strong done
clear
E)
Both I and II are strong done
clear
View Solution play_arrow
-
question_answer12)
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ?strong? argument is and which a ?weak? argument is. |
Statement: Should there be a maximum limit for the number of ministers in the Central Government? |
Arguments: I. No. The political party in power should have the freedom to decide the number of ministers to be appointed. |
II. Yes. The number of ministers should be restricted to a certain percentage of the total number of seats in the parliament to avoid unnecessary expenditure. |
A)
Only argument I is strong done
clear
B)
Only argument II is strong done
clear
C)
Either I or II is strong done
clear
D)
Neither I nor II is strong done
clear
E)
Both I and II are strong done
clear
View Solution play_arrow
-
question_answer13)
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ?strong? argument is and which a ?weak? argument is. |
Statement: Should foreign films be banned in India? |
Arguments: I. Yes. They depict an alien culture which adversely affects our values. |
II. No. Foreign films are of a high artistic standard. |
A)
Only argument tis strong done
clear
B)
Only argument II is strong done
clear
C)
Either I or II is strong done
clear
D)
Neither I nor II is strong done
clear
E)
Both I and II are strong done
clear
View Solution play_arrow
-
question_answer14)
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ?strong? argument is and which a ?weak? argument is. |
Statement: Is buying things on instalments profitable to the customer? |
Arguments: I. Yes. He has to pay less. |
II. No, paying instalments upsets the family budget. |
A)
Only argument I is strong done
clear
B)
Only argument II is strong done
clear
C)
Either I or II is strong done
clear
D)
Neither I nor II is strong done
clear
E)
Both I and II are strong done
clear
View Solution play_arrow
-
question_answer15)
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ?strong? argument is and which a ?weak? argument is. |
Statement: Should Doordarshan be given autonomous status? |
Arguments: I. Yes. It will help Doordarshan to have fair and impartial coverage of all important events. |
II. No. The coverage of events will be decided by a few who may not have healthy outlook. |
A)
Only argument I is strong done
clear
B)
Only argument II is strong done
clear
C)
Either I or II is strong done
clear
D)
Neither I nor II is strong done
clear
E)
Both I and II are strong done
clear
View Solution play_arrow
-
question_answer16)
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ?strong? argument is and which a ?weak? argument is. |
Statement: Should adult education programme be given priority over compulsory education programme? |
Arguments: I. No. It will also help in success of compulsory education programme. |
II. Yes. It will help to eliminate the adult illiteracy. |
A)
Only argument I is strong done
clear
B)
Only argument II is strong done
clear
C)
Either I or II is strong done
clear
D)
Neither I nor II is strong done
clear
E)
Both I and II are strong done
clear
View Solution play_arrow
-
question_answer17)
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ?strong? argument is and which a ?weak? argument is. |
Statement: Should new universities be established in India? |
Arguments: I. No. We have still not achieved the target for literacy. |
II. No. We will have to face the problem of unemployed but highly qualified people. |
A)
Only argument I is strong done
clear
B)
Only argument II is strong done
clear
C)
Either I or II is strong done
clear
D)
Neither I nor II is strong done
clear
E)
Both I and II are strong done
clear
View Solution play_arrow
-
question_answer18)
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ?strong? argument is and which a ?weak? argument is. |
Statement: Should non-vegetarian food be totally banned in our country? |
Arguments: I. Yes. It is expensive and therefore, it is beyond the means of most people in our country. |
II. No. Nothing should be banned in a democratic country like ours. |
A)
Only argument I is strong done
clear
B)
Only argument II is strong done
clear
C)
Either I or II is strong done
clear
D)
Neither I nor II is strong done
clear
E)
Both I and II are strong done
clear
View Solution play_arrow
-
question_answer19)
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ?strong? argument is and which a ?weak? argument is. |
Statement: Should a total ban be put on trapping wild animals? |
Arguments: I. Yes. Trappers are making a lot of money; |
II. No. Bans on hunting and trapping are not effective. |
A)
Only argument I is strong done
clear
B)
Only argument II is strong done
clear
C)
Either I or II is strong done
clear
D)
Neither I nor II is strong done
clear
E)
Both I and II are strong done
clear
View Solution play_arrow
-
question_answer20)
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ?strong? argument is and which a ?weak? argument is. |
Statement: Should Government close down loss-making public sector enterprises? |
Arguments: I. No. All employees will lose their jobs, security and earning, what would they do? |
II. Yes. In a competitive world the rule is ?survival of the fittest?. |
A)
Only argument I is strong done
clear
B)
Only argument II is strong done
clear
C)
Either I or II is strong done
clear
D)
Neither I nor II is strong done
clear
E)
Both I and II are strong done
clear
View Solution play_arrow