A) Doctrine of sovereign immunity has relevance in the present day context. done clear
B) State can succeed in pleading its immunity by showing that the tort was committed by its servants in the course of discharge of statutory functions. done clear
C) State cannot claim sovereign immunity if its officers are negligent in exercise of their powers. done clear
D) State can claim sovereign immunity even if its officers are negligent in exercise of their powers. done clear
View Solution play_arrowA) Not participate in Parliamentary proceedings done clear
B) Only be answerable to the Chief Justice of India done clear
C) Address both the Houses of Parliament at the time of joint session done clear
D) Not be answerable to any court for the exercise of the powers of his office done clear
View Solution play_arrowA) Part XII done clear
B) Part XI done clear
C) Part IX done clear
D) Part XIII done clear
View Solution play_arrow| Assertion (A): Article 300 of the Constitution of India has specifically removed the distinction between sovereign and non-sovereign functions with respect to government's liability for tort in India. |
| Reason (R): Government is liable for tort which is the result of its non-sovereign function. |
A) Both A and R are individually true and R is the correct explanation of A done clear
B) Both A and R are individually true but R is not the correct explanation of A done clear
C) A is true but R is false done clear
D) A is false but R is true done clear
View Solution play_arrowA) President, Vice-President and Governor done clear
B) President, Prime Minister and Governor done clear
C) President and Governor only done clear
D) President, Vice-President and Prime Minister done clear
View Solution play_arrow
You need to login to perform this action.
You will be redirected in
3 sec
