| Directions: Given below is a statement of legal principle, followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts and select the most appropriate answer among the alternatives. |
| Principle 'Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situation'. |
| Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Jeevan, who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan. |
A) Pavan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his house
B) Pavan is liable, because as a neighbour, heshould have realised Seevan's delicate nature
C) Pavan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Jeevan
D) None of the above Using the standards of a reasonable man, the sound of typing cannot be said as disturbing and hence it is a reasonable one.
Correct Answer: C
Solution :
Pawan is not liable. The reason is typing sound did not disturb anyone else other than Jeevan. Using the standards of a reasonable man the sound of typing cannot be said a disturbing and hence it is reasonable one.
You need to login to perform this action.
You will be redirected in
3 sec
