| Directions: Given below is a statement of legal principle, followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts and select the most appropriate answer among the alternatives. |
| Principle Any direct physical interference with goods in somebody's possession without lawful justification is called trespass of goods. |
| Facts Z purchased a car from a person, who had no title to it and sent it to a garage for repair. X believing wrongly that the car was his, removed it from the garage. |
A) X cannot be held responsible for trespass of goods as he was under a wrong belief
B) X can be held responsible for trespass of goods
C) X has not committed any wrong
D) None of the above
Correct Answer: B
Solution :
X can be held responsible for tresspass of goods because he made direct physical interference with car in Z's possess in sent to a garage, without lawful justification.
You need to login to perform this action.
You will be redirected in
3 sec
