CLAT Sample Paper CLAT Sample Paper-7

  • question_answer
    Directions: Given below is a statement of legal principle, followed by a factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts and select the most appropriate answer among the alternatives.
    Principle Any direct physical interference with goods in somebody's possession without lawful justification is called trespass of goods.
    Facts Z purchased a car from a person, who had no title to it and sent it to a garage for repair. X believing wrongly that the car was his, removed it from the garage.

    A)  X cannot be held responsible for trespass of goods as he was under a wrong belief

    B)  X can be held responsible for trespass of goods

    C)  X has not committed any wrong

    D)  None of the above

    Correct Answer: B

    Solution :

    X can be held responsible for tresspass of goods because he made direct physical interference with car in Z's possess in sent to a garage, without lawful justification.

You need to login to perform this action.
You will be redirected in 3 sec spinner