| What is meant by saying that the Directive Principles of State Policy are non-justiciable? |
| 1. In case they are violated the matter cannot be taken to the Court |
| 2. Courts are debarred from consideration of Directive Principles |
| 3. The law of the land does not recognize their existence |
| 4. They are sacrosanct |
A) 1 & 2
B) 1 only
C) 1, 2 & 3
D) 1, 2, 3, 4
Correct Answer: A
Solution :
[a] The Supreme Court and the High Courts have the powers to issue orders or writs for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. The Directive Principles of State Policy, on the other hand, confer no legal rights and create no legal remedies. This should not lead us to conclude that the Directive Principles are inferior or subordinate to the Fundamental Rights
You need to login to perform this action.
You will be redirected in
3 sec
