2. Sample Papers
  3. CLAT

CLAT Sample Paper UG-CLAT Mock Test-2 (2020)

  • question_answer
    Direction: Study the following passage carefully and answer the questions given below:
    An attribution is an unplanned clarification for a behavior or an event. An example to explain attribution can be taken as; a nurse spots a co-worker executing a process wrongly on a patient. So, the nurse is most likely to try to develop an attribution clarification for this behavior. This could result to the co-worker being poorly trained which means that the observer is attributing the behavior to insufficient skills. Research shows that implementation of unplanned attributions, is important for the adaptation of the changing environments and to overcome the encounters we are challenged within our everyday lives.
    What is the probable attribution for a condition where a lawyer appears for a client to prove him innocent, even if it is known to the lawyer that his client is guilty?

    A) The attribution is a mislead

    B) The attribution is planned

    C) The attribution is unplanned

    D) The attribution is distorted

    Correct Answer: D

    Solution :

    (d) Reasoning Type: Modal Logic\[\to \]arguing about necessity and possibility Focus of the question: Argument\[\to \]strong argument for the basic idea of attribution Relationship analogy: Performer and action analogy\[\to \]straightforward analogy type which is based on taking two sets of performers and their corresponding actions The question focuses on the strong argument on how the attribution can be interpreted for a specified case where the unplanned attribution can be observed. Here the lawyer appearing for a client to prove him innocent against the truth that the client is guilty is the distortion of attribution. Rationale: (d) Reasoning type: Modal Logic\[\to \]arguing about necessity and possibility Focus of the question: Argument\[\to \]strong argument for the basic idea of attribution Relationship analogy: Performer and action analogy\[\to \]straightforward analogy type which is based on taking two sets of performers and their corresponding actions The question focuses on the strong argument on how the attribution can be interpreted for a specified case where the unplanned attribution can be observed. Here the lawyer appearing for a client to prove him innocent against the truth that the client is guilty is the distortion of attribution.


You need to login to perform this action.
You will be redirected in 3 sec spinner