CLAT CLAT Solved Paper-2013

  • question_answer
    Directions This section consists of fifty (50) questions. Each question consists of legal propositions principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Such principles may or may not be true in the real sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principles except the principles that are given here in below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your interest towards study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be unacceptable for any other reason. It is not the objective of this section to test your knowledge of law.
    Principle Whoever by words, either spoken or written brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards the government established by law in India shall be punished. However, comments expressing disapprobation of the administrative or other action of the government without exciting or attempting to excite hatred, contempt or disaffection, do not constitute an offence. Facts A renowned professor of Economics wrote a critical comment on the economic policies of the Government of India in a National Daily. This piece of writing generated academic debate not only in the print media but also on television and internet. A student of law asked the fellow Indians on a social networking website to assemble at a particular place for peaceful and silent demonstration against the said economic policies on a stipulated date and time. The crowd assembled at that venue and started shouting anti-government slogans. Police arrested the professor.

    A)  The professor has committed the offence

    B)  The professor has not committed any offence

    C)  The student of law has committed the offence

    D)  The crowd has committed an offence

    Correct Answer: B

    Solution :

    Ans.  According to the principle given here, the professor has not committed any offence by writing a critical comment on the economic policies of the government, because he did not tried to excite or attempted to excite hatred, contempt or disaffection against the government.


You need to login to perform this action.
You will be redirected in 3 sec spinner