| Directions: In the following questions, a statement of Assertion [A] is followed by a statement of Reason (R). Mark the correct choice as: |
| Assertion [A]: Gauss's law of magnetism is different from that for electrostatics. |
| Reason (R): Isolated magnetic poles are not known to exist. |
A) Both Assertion [A] and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of Assertion [A]
B) Both Assertion [A] and Reason (R) are true but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of Assertion [A]
C) Assertion [A] is true but Reason (R) is false
D) Assertion [A] is false and Reason (R) is also false
Correct Answer: A
Solution :
(a) Gauss's law of magnetism is different from that for electrostatics because electric charges do not necessarily exist in pairs but magnetic monopoles do not exist.
You need to login to perform this action.
You will be redirected in
3 sec
