DIRECTIONS: In each question below is given a statement/allowed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement. |
Prime age school-going children in urban India have now become avid as well as more regular viewers of television, even in households without a TV. As a result there has been an alarming decline in the extent of readership of newspapers. |
Conclusions: |
Method of increasing the readership of newspapers should be devised. |
A team of experts should be sent to other countries to study the impact of TV on the readership of newspapers. |
A) Only conclusion I follows
B) Only conclusion II follows
C) Either I or II follows
D) Neither I nor II follows
E) Both I and II follow
Correct Answer: D
Solution :
The statement concentrates on the increasing viewership of TV and does not stress either on increasing the readership of newspapers or making studies regarding the same. So, neither I nor II follows.You need to login to perform this action.
You will be redirected in
3 sec