| Direction: Given between are some statements followed by two arguments. Read carefully and decide which of the arguments strongly support the statement. |
| Statement Does President's rule in a state improve law and order in the disturbed area? |
| Arguments |
| I. Yes, the Chief Minister does not know how to cope with the deteriorating conditions of law and order. |
| II. No, because the President is not physically present there. |
A) Argument I is strong
B) Argument II is strong
C) Both I and II are strong
D) Neither I nor II is strong
Correct Answer: D
Solution :
Both the arguments are weak. Argument I is weak as it is totally hypothetical. Argument II is irrelevant.
You need to login to perform this action.
You will be redirected in
3 sec
