| Direction: In the question there are given two or more statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. |
| Statements: Some rules are stunts. |
| Some acts are stunts. |
| Conclusions: I. Some rules being acts is a possibility. |
| II. All the stunts will necessarily be acts. |
A) if only conclusion I follows.
B) if only conclusion II follows.
C) if either conclusion I or II follows.
D) if neither conclusion I nor II follows.
E) if both conclusions I and II follow.
Correct Answer: A
Solution :
Some stunts are acts (I). Now, Some rules are stunts (I) + Some stunts are acts (I) = I + I = No conclusion. But the possibility in I exists. Hence conclusion I follows. Again, Some acts are stunts \[(I)\to \] conversion \[\to \]Some stunts are acts (I). Hence conclusion II does not follow.
You need to login to perform this action.
You will be redirected in
3 sec
