| Each question consists of legal principle(s) (here-in-after referred to as 'principle') and facts. Such proposition may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. Principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Only one of the alternatives, i.e. [a], [b], [c] or [d] is the most reasonable conclusion. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the principles that are given herein below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your ability in legal aptitude, study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the 'most reasonable conclusion' arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason. |
| Principle Inducing any animal to move or to change its motion and thereby intentionally causing fear of injury or annoyance to others by such act, is an offence of use of criminal force. |
| Facts 'X' incites his dog to chase and run after his neighbour Y, to teach Y to stay away from him. The act is done without neighbour's consent and against his will |
A) X' has committed no offence
B) 'X' has committed no offence because no harm is caused to T
C) 'X' has committed no offence because his intention was only to put fear in the mind of y
D) 'X' has committed an offence of use of criminal force
Correct Answer: D
Solution :
Sol. [d] As per the principle, 'X' has used criminal force by inciting his dog to chase and run after 'V. He did this intentionally to cause fear or annoyance to 'V which will be taken as a criminal offence.
You need to login to perform this action.
You will be redirected in
3 sec
